To God, Our Motherland and Her Subjects

Editorial Avenue No. 29: 15th January 2026

Preamble:

The Editorials for the months of November 2025, December 2025 and January 2026 intend to introduce to humanity a three-part metaphysical structure that will be developed respectively as follows:

Lesson 1 (November 2025): It is Humanity’s innate desire for order and coherence that misattributes external disturbances to inner fault

Lesson 2 (December 2025): To look inward first without identifying systemic imbalance keeps us enclosed into falsehood.

Lesson 3: (January 2026): The consequence is a representation of Godlessness

This metaphysical structure comes with 3 precepts:

Precept 1: To look inward blindly without contextual reality = Illusion.

Precept 2: To understand context without nurturing inner stillness = Disorientation

Precept 3: To align both is the uncovering of the truth … and a return of the Sacred

***

Part three:

The man dug out his sword from the entrails of the earth and swirled it victoriously above his head before slicing off a red rose from its stem. With a whimper, he fell to the ground and avidly searched for the panopticon looming ahead. Offering up the flower on top of his damaged sword, he stated simply:

“I did it all for you and only you. Now make me matter to you again!”.

And in that moment, the man lost his eyes.

***

One fundamental flaw of social structures is the rationale that a utilitarian society is the most efficient way of helping a group of humans brought together into functioning as one unit. The divine laws of giving and receiving are transformed on Earth into notions of collaboration, contribution and sacrifice of the true self for the greater good of the whole. Humans follow this rule to the letter. They accept to have their skills, their worth and their relational self utilised for the greater good. And so, through hard work, they produce for their community, and they ensure their families will be raised into equally functional members of a society that will upgrade economies and provide more power to science and technocratic advancements. But neither the human body nor the human psyche can remain functional and prosperous if their only goal is to be instrumental. Just as World War 1 (WW1) ended up discovering that “shell shock” was actually more than just a temporary stressful breakdown from repeated exposure to combat artillery, online platforms where the human body is  monetised blur the lines between the work-self and living in the imagination of the other as an instrument of pleasure. The shared error in both of these premises is that a human being can divide her/himself into separate compartments that serve a specific function; that these compartments are useful (providing for one’s family) and can be utilised for a greater good (protecting one’s civilisation). WW1 science assumed that the human mind is a machine of resilience and that if one simply removed the stimulus (combat), one had efficiently cut off the stressor, and the human being would jump right back into its utilitarian state. In the contemporary world of online monetisation of the self, the premise is that the creator is in control of the public content and the production of their work-self. But the devastating truth is that the human psyche is meaning-centred. And so, the human mind needs to be allowed to exist without it becoming an instrument for the other. In the case of both war veterans and social media creators, they may believe that there has been a clear separation of personal self from the work-self but when the human body is used, it ceases to become solely ‘mine-in-the-private-sphere’. It remains a replayable entity in the imagination-of-another.

The metaphysical diagnosis that as such comes through is that human beings on Earth have subordinated Order for Good and by so doing, they have created societies where the only structural possibility is to not believe in divine Good. Order answers a fundamental question: “How do we keep things functioning?”. It is stable, predictable, coherent and continuous. Order matters but is secondary to the nature of the Good. The Good does not assume compliance, efficiency or obedience to a Panopticon God that punishes mistakes. The Good instead asks: “What aligns this Being with what they were meant to be?”. The Good presupposes a reality where we are in right relationships, there is responsiveness towards the energy we put out and it is possible to have a re-orientation. As Order lies supreme in how the human mind perceives the nature of God, God becomes primarily the all-seeing-eye, primarily the Judge and primarily the condemner. A Panopticon God does not need to induce fear of punishment. It merely needs to remain. In such a world, God is no longer encountered as a source of meaning, but as a watching structure an all-seeing eye stripped of interiority, mercy, or dialogical possibility. The human being no longer asks, “Is what I am doing aligned with Truth?” but “Am I seen?” And eventually, “Will I still matter if I am not?” This is how scepticism toward the Sacred is born. Not from rebellion, nor from secular arrogance, but from exhaustion. A being that has been rendered permanently visible cannot sustain reverence. A psyche that is continuously instrumentalised loses its capacity for inward stillness. And without inward stillness, the Sacred does not disappear. It becomes inaccessible.This then becomes the dominant, interpretive lens through which the nature of God and the nature of the Good is understood. When Order is supreme, then God has no choice but to enact the role of an enforcer. He becomes punitive by virtue of the role that has been ascribed to him and not with respect to his true nature.

However, the war example we provided above brings forth another fundamental premise of life on Earth: the human psyche is principally meaning-centred. Meaning is frequently mistaken for our beliefs, the narratives we hold, the values we have and the symbols that exist in our lives. But soldiers go to war because they believe in something greater than themselves yet still go through existential collapse. Our human bodies are not simply a temporary biological organism that makes soul incarnation possible. The human body is what makes the possibility of remaining human a constant but without meaning, even that constant collapses.

Which brings us to the conclusion of this three-part metaphysical theory: to reorient towards meaning is to understand that which is sacred and to understand the sacred is to enter into a dialogical relationship with the true nature of God.

Image created through the assistance of AI technology.

***

End note:

Our monthly editorials are pure channellings received from Heaven. The administrative team responsible for their transmission has the duty to publish each editorial on the 15th of every month. This date is symbolic, as it coincides with the official founding date of the web platform of the accredited Centre known as “God's Save Me,” on September 15, 2023. More than a simple editorial, “The Editorial Avenue” is a sacred pathway opened to humanity so that it may reconnect with the Light, for God cares for everyone.

---

AUTRES BLOGS

AVENUE ÉDITORIALE