The 3-fold Union

Editorial Avenue No. 27: 15th December 2025

Preamble:

The Editorials for the months of November 2025, December 2025 and January 2026 intend to introduce to humanity a three-part metaphysical structure that will be developed respectively as follows:

Lesson 1 (November 2025): It is Humanity’s innate desire for order and coherence that misattributes external disturbances to inner fault

Lesson 2 (December 2025): To look inward first without identifying systemic imbalance keeps us enclosed into falsehood.

Lesson 3: (January 2026): The consequence is a representation of Godlessness

This metaphysical structure comes with 3 precepts:

Precept 1: To look inward blindly without contextual reality = Illusion.

Precept 2: To understand context without nurturing inner stillness = Disorientation

Precept 3: To align both is the uncovering of the truth … and a return of the Sacred

***

Part 2:

“The work to be done is not about forcing oneself to see.

It is about foreseeing.”

 - The Hierarchy

In the Editorial for November 2025, we introduced the notion of epistemic truth (what presents as mine vs what is not actually mine). The teaching was that the Self can mistakenly attribute external disturbances to its true nature and thereby experience an identity collapse that can lead to disillusionment or rebellion. For example, in the Twilight Zone analogy (Maple Street), a community responds to an invisible alien disturbance by turning inward however, as they lack one essential tool of discernment that will be revealed today, the inwardness that should have protected them sabotages their capacity for proper moral judgement. In other words, an external darkness contaminated both their mind and heart all whilst misattributing their resulting behaviours to their own Self. This was a diagnosis that helped explain why human beings sometimes collapse despite being the bearers of a divine gift: the gift of a Self incarnated into Humanity. It also opens the door to Lesson 2: “To look inward first without identifying systemic imbalance keeps us enclosed into falsehood.” But that lesson solely answered one question: Truth sometimes fails to be localised, leading to human grief, loss and suffering. It did not however explain how the Self must act once the systemic imbalance has actually been seen and recognised.

Most of us naturally operate through a dyad capacity. We hold cognitive imagination or the ability to apply logical thought when thinking of the other’s experiences (the principle of the Mind). We also hold emotional imagination or the ability to imagine how the other would feel if they were harmed (the principle of the Heart). Together, this dyad capacity works as empathy. Empathy feels. Empathy is conscientious. Empathy is what allows us to do the right thing. But this dyad does not adequately represent an adult form of ethical consciousness. What was missing amidst the community on Maple Street is ethical imagination. Ethical imagination is not about imagining what/how the other feels or perceives harm that is being done to them. It is the ability to see the other person’s inner world as being both real and inviolable and thereby foreseeing how our own actions will have an impact on their reality. Ethical imagination is about restraint and not suppression. It is governed by the idea that one’s thoughts, desires and emotions first belong to oneself and cannot contaminate the other without explicit consent. It is the difference between a love that aligns itself by light and a love that is misattributed and thereby possesses and consumes. The Maple Street community showed they had activated their cognitive imagination capacity as soon as they started questioning: “What could be happening to our town right now?”. This is a protective and problem-solving tactic that is still moral at this point. When emotional imagination kicks in, they continue to think and feel as a community that looks out for each other: “How do we keep our children safe?”. The resulting violence that follows after fear escalates shows that human beings do have character forged from a dyad of cognitive and emotional imagination. But the Maple Street situation is an example that exceeds that dyad and leads to projection onto the other. For ethical imagination to activate quickly, it requires a third axiom (Will) that communities do not consciously cultivate because its main premise is that:

“I do not see properly right now, therefore I will not act lest I violate the other”

Maple Street collapses because it projects its intolerable uncertainty and therefore violent behaviour onto the other. Overwhelming fear has taken over. What if it is my neighbour plotting against me? What if we are about to be invaded? What if my children go hungry? The nature of collapse though is that it demands immediate attention for securing an unsafe situation. In a way, that is when we stop being human. Genuine pain on the other hand reveals our humanity. Ethical imagination is not introduced at baseline human functioning because it is the recognition that what we are experiencing may be intolerable uncertainty but it is not justified moral permission for violating the other. It implicitly recognises that a state of urgency is not Truth, fear is not Evidence of evil and a logical explanation is not a sufficient justification to act. The desire to protect one’s own family or to secure life for them is not what was lacking in ethics for the Maple Street community. They were under intense emotional duress. However, the difference between morality and adult morality lies in this specific distinction. Whilst morality in our cultures introduces rules, regulations and the fear of God, an adult moral cognition goes beyond by preventing impulsive thoughts, emotions and desires from leaking and thereby crossing into action. Actions are the ones that carry true moral weight. Once an action has been undertaken and a distortion has occurred, it does become part of our duty as humans to provide reparation for the injury. Thoughts and feelings belong to your individual Self but these can be unstable or contaminated by external factors. What governs inner life is morally neutral but personally significant. Action though is where the Other gets directly affected because action will enter another person’s reality.

Ethical imagination though is not pure restraint. It is considered to be an elevated capacity for foresight, and it is what truly protects the Other’s inner world and thereby preserves the essence of our Humanity. However, to have a will operating by itself becomes only a faculty of foresight. Just like cognitive imagination (Mind) by itself is a faculty of reason and emotional imagination (Heart) is that of nuance. What is required for the manifestation of ethical imagination is their merging into a 3-fold union.

This 3-fold union is not three separate ideas placed side by side. It is a balancing structure that equitably bears the load. Within the Mind, ethical imagination foresees moral impact. But mental energy alone cannot prevent impulsive action from manifesting. We move to the Heart, ethical imagination develops dignity and reverence for the Other. But emotional energy alone cannot regulate impulses that will seek to break through. When the principle of Will manifests, it generates a container in the form of classification. Firstly, it defines the frames of permissibility (creation of a boundary). Secondly, it defines the rules (dignity stands above all else). Thirdly, the energy is allowed to exist within a location. This tells the mind where it is allowed to go, the heart what principles are to be held to the highest standard and the will, when restraint must be applied so boundaries are not broken.

A container as such stops the jolt of harmful behaviour by establishing a sealed architecture. Here is what is sacred. Here is what should remain private. Here is the limit. That is when the unconscious (or raw unmetabolised energy) stops scanning for openings to leak out of.

The 3-fold union thereby operates through:

Mind:

I am detecting a lack of truth. I will not act if it leads the Other into delusion.

Heart:

I recognise the Other’s inner world. I will not act if it violates their dignity.

Will:

I foresee the impact of an action. I therefore decide whether it is allowed to exist outside of me.

Image created through the support of AI technology

***

Note de fin:

End note:

Our monthly editorials are pure channellings received from Heaven. The administrative team responsible for their transmission has the duty to publish each editorial on the 15th of every month. This date is symbolic, as it coincides with the official founding date of the web platform of the accredited Centre known as “God's Save Me,” on September 15, 2023. More than a simple editorial, “The Editorial Avenue” is a sacred pathway opened to humanity so that it may reconnect with the Light, for God cares for everyone.

---

AUTRES BLOGS

AVENUE ÉDITORIALE