All is fair in Love and Law
- GODSAVEME
- Oct 15
- 4 min read
(Part 2 of the series " And thus, being unaware of what we already have, we overconsume...')
Editorial Avenue No. 25: 15th October 2025
In what is perceived to be the absence of a benevolent head in the universe, the systems of the world have developed three ways of reproducing hierarchies of conduct and value that mimic what such a Head could have produced. These man-made hierarchies maintain coherence, significance, and linearity within the conduits of space and time. In the first instance where destabilisation occurs within societies, we have observed that the system instinctively recentres its core of authority. From crowns to borders to family restructuring, this is how humans are invited to either reintegrate or exit the proposed values. Those who successfully reintegrate become law-abiders, and those who choose to exit completely go through banishment or punishment by a jury composed of their fellow peers.
This black-and-white frame of governance usually instils either rebellion and fear (for those who exit) or submissiveness and a desire for good (for those who reintegrate). What is currently problematic with this first phase of imitating the mannerisms of the benevolent Head is that there is always a loss in translation between what is truly divine benevolence and what is, in fact, coercion, an imprisonment of the other under the idea that the Head of a State can ultimately only choose to do the Highest Good. Masculinism (or anti-feminism) and feminism (or anti-masculinity) are two such historic examples of this first phase of recentring authority. Though their core idea is to seek out balance and equality, the result tends to produce domination, one side over the other. The rule of law, therefore, is not always fair. In the second phase, a system that still seeks uprightness will feel a pull towards appeasing its people. This, however, is an equally dangerous step; even though it is born of the light found in love, it loses an essential value: that of temperance, balance, harmony, and therefore pure equality. That is probably why the third phase exists at all. Humans begin to disengage entirely, for neither the rule of law nor the rule of love provides what they most need for change, the right emotion.
If some people today believe in God whilst others do not, we could always attest to darkness having veiled the minds of all. Yet what we have noticed is that people do not instantly start believing even when freed from the burdens, possessions, and illusions that once held them away from their paths. Instead, they stand in a land of liminality — the space between a past experienced as Hell and the possibility of touching Heaven — unable to either look up or look down. And yet their consciousness has evolved. They know of the law; they understand moral clarity better than before. But the law, by itself, remains insignificant if they do not feel magnetically drawn to it. That is the difference between knowing the truth and embodying it through lived experience.
This experience does not arise through contact with the other, even when the other is a Master. At that level, what one achieves is a consumption of the Master’s knowledge a consumption of the rules of law as applied to one’s own destiny, as well as a consumption of the love that makes all of this possible through desire, want, and feeling. In this land of liminality, we thus create societies of dependency: dependency on God for solving man-made karma; dependency on His benevolence for applying mercy to past deeds; dependency on figures of authority for carving our paths. And through this dependency, we crave love and all of its attributes: admiration, compassion, kindness, healing, morality. But a love untempered by the rule of law is nothing but overconsumption, in the same way that law untempered by the goodness of love becomes the very dependency that limits us. All is indeed fair in love and law, for love must protect the morality of law just as law must preserve the clarity of love. And when both are applied in equal measure to the life of the one who has been made aware, the right emotion finally reveals itself.
That right emotion is not desire, but a structural need for transmission.
The student no longer orients toward the Master for knowledge to be consumed and then experienced, but to experience relational attunement. This is when the line of truth reveals itself as absolute, for it is channelled from one embodied consciousness to another. The Master becomes a living vector of that embodiment — someone whose way of being carries coherence, significance, and lineage-based linearity that connects one to the energy, vibration, and consciousness of the benevolent Head that is so sought after. It is this relational encounter, not the consumption of transmissions, that leads to initiation into the Way of the Master. And it is the same with the encounter with God: it is less about cultural belief or innate resonance than about our hunger for the right transmission — a form that is orderly and precise (Law, or the impulse to shape through truth) yet never wounds autonomy (Love, or the impulse to heal and transform through sacredness).
All becomes fair in Love and Law.
***
End note:
Our monthly editorials are pure channellings received from Heaven. The administrative team responsible for their transcription has the duty to publish each of these editorials on the fifteenth of each month. This date is symbolic as it aligns with the 15th of September 2023, official birth date of the web platform of the Centre accredited under the name "God Save Me". More than just being an editorial, "The Editorial Avenue" is a sacred avenue that is opened up to humanity in order to allow all to reconnect with the Light as God cares for everyone.
Comments